Legal Opinion

City of Kansas v. Corrigan

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1885PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Jaolcson Criminal Court. — Hon. H. P* White, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

— This proceeding was instituted against the defendant before the city recorder, by information based on an ordinance of the City of Kansas, bearing date June 29, 1880, as follows:

“Section 1. No person, company, or corporation,' nor any person as president, superintendent, or other officer, or agent of any street or horse railroad company or corporation, shall keep, use, or maintain any street or horse railroad track, or part of a track upon any street, or part of a street, in the City of Kansas, which said street or part of a street, is now, or hereafter may be paved with blocks of stone,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. City of Kansas v. Corrigan Consolidated Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. City of Arkansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  2. Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Holwerson v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. State ex rel. National Subway Co. v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  5. City of Madison v. Southern Wisconsin Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API