Legal Opinion · Dissent

Singleton v. Norris

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 23, 1998No. CR 98-218Published

1DissentTom Glaze, Justice

The Attorney General correctly points out that the majority opinion staying Mr. Singleton’s execution is contrary to three of this court’s earlier cases where the court denied stays. See Pickens v. State, 316 Ark. 811, 875 S.W.2d 835 (1994) (court denied stay where Pickens raised constitutional issue asserted to be pending before the U. S. Supreme Court); Fairchild v. Norris, 314 Ark. 221, 861 S.W.2d 111 (1993) (court denied stay where Fairchild argued a constitutional claim of first impression concerning his incompetence to be executed; court held Fairchild was barred by doctrine of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fairchild v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Rector v. ClintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Pickens v. TuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API