Legal Opinion

Claim of Nazzaro v. Angelilli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 2, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochrane, P. J.

The award covers the period from June 7, 1923, to March 15, 1925. The average weekly wage of claimant at *416the time of the accident was twenty-seven dollars and fifty cents. The Board found that his wage-earning capacity during the period covered by the award was reduced to twelve dollars a week and accordingly fixed his compensation at two-thirds of the difference, or ten dollars and thirty-four cents a week. Claimant only worked six days during the entire period of disability and claimed that he was obliged to give it up because it was too heavy. With a single exception he made no effort to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Guiterman v. Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamship Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hagler v. GillilandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  3. Brouillette v. Weymouth Shoe CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961
  4. Claim of McLaughlin v. Curtis-Quillen Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  5. Sachs v. American Central InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API