Legal Opinion

George Forrens v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 1, 1974No. 74-1089PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before CARTER and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and SCHNACKE,* District Judge.

SCHNACKE, District Judge:

Petitioner seeks to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, alleging that his plea of guilty to a charge of armed bank robbery was involuntary because he did not understand the English language at the time of his plea, and that he was given a 25-year sentence even though his lawyer promised him a maximum sentence of seven" years if he entered a plea of guilty.

The District Court after reviewing the records and files in the case denied the petition without an evidentiary hearing.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Albert James Tweedy, Jr., Defendant-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. Harris v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987
  3. Oscar Goodwin, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. George Forrens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  5. Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API