George Forrens v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before CARTER and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and SCHNACKE,* District Judge.
SCHNACKE, District Judge:
Petitioner seeks to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, alleging that his plea of guilty to a charge of armed bank robbery was involuntary because he did not understand the English language at the time of his plea, and that he was given a 25-year sentence even though his lawyer promised him a maximum sentence of seven" years if he entered a plea of guilty.
The District Court after reviewing the records and files in the case denied the petition without an evidentiary hearing.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Albert James Tweedy, Jr., Defendant-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Harris v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987
- Oscar Goodwin, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- George Forrens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978