Legal Opinion

Kroeger v. Union Indemnity Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1932No. Civil No. 3169PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Charles H. Kroeger and Katie A. Kroeger, his wife, hereinafter called plaintiffs, brought suit against Union Indemnity Company, hereinafter called defendant, to recover on a bond guaranteeing the performance of a certain building contract. Defendant .answered admitting the execu tion of the bond, but claimed as its principal defense that it was given to secure the performance of an entirely different and distinct contract from the one which plaintiffs allege to have been breached. The case was tried to a jury, but, at the conclusion of the evidence, the trial court sustained a motion for an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guaranty Co. v. Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. LentzArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Bergin v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Pulaski Hall Ass'n v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. New York Plumbing & Building Supplies Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilshire Insurance v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API