Legal Opinion

Hartigan v. Hartigan

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1909PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Monongalia County. Action by Elizabeth W. Ilartigan and others against James W. üartigan. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, Judge:

In a suit for divorce, pending in the circuit court of Mo-nongalia county, it was decreed “that the plaintiff, Mary Y. üartigan, be divorced from bed and board from her husband, *472the said defendant., James W. Hartigan; that the said plaintiff and defendant be perpetually separated; that said plaintiff be hereafter perpetually and fully protected in her person from said defendant and in all her property, and estate now owned by her except as hereinafter provided, and in all her property and estate hereafter acquired by her against any claim, demand or estate of said defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Godman v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Virginia · 1893
  3. Hartigan v. HartiganWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hale v. HaleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Chapman v. ParsonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Gum v. GumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  4. Sperry v. SperryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State v. EvansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API