Legal Opinion

Rohssler v. Rohssler

New York County Courts

Decided April 15, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action for partition.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, Franklin, J.

This is an action for partition brought by the adult heirs at law of Samuel Rohssler, owner of the legal title. The defendant Mary Rohssler, widow of Samuel Rohssler, sets up by way of counterclaim an alleged cause of action to impress an implied trust upon the premises in her favor. In support of such relief the counterclaim alleges that the premises were purchased with her money, previously intrusted with her said husband under an oral agreement that title would be taken in their joint names as tenants by the entirety; that thereafter her husband represented to her that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weston v. . StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Howard Iron Works v. Buffalo Elevating Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Tonges v. Vanderveer Canarsie Improvement Syndicate, Inc., New York County Courts1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zim v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  2. Kutun v. KranzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Thomas v. McFarlinMonroe County Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API