Legal Opinion

Linhoss v. Hodgson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1933No. Appeal, 106PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal by defendant from judgment entered on tbe verdict in an action of trespass to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a collision between tbe automobile of plaintiff and that of defendant. Tbe sole question raised for our consideration is the amount of tbe verdict, defendant alleging it to be excessive.

Tbe verdict of the jury for the husband was $2,412.50 compensatory damages, with $500 punitive damages additional, and for the wife $15,264.50 compensatory dam ages, with $500 punitive damages. After argument upon the motion for new trial, the court below…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Petrie v. Kaufmann & Baer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Scott v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Filer v. FilerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Martin v. LetterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Neidlinger v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Allen, Admr. v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Walker Et Ux. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Dauphin Deposit Trust Co. v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Cavey Et Ux., to Use v. Bethlehem CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API