Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Kneidl

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 5, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

59 N.J. Super. 382 (1960)

157 A.2d 861

GEORGE W. SCHULTZ AND ELEANOR G. SCHULTZ, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

FRIEDA KNEIDL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 1, 1960.

Decided February 5, 1960.

Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and HANEMAN.

Mr. Nathan Bernstein argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Slingland, Houman and Bernstein and Mr. William P. Westling, attorneys).

Mr. Archibald Kreiger argued the cause for defendant-respondent.

2Per curiam

In this action for damages by tenants for breach by the landlord of a covenant in the lease which it…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schultz v. KneidlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Liqui-Box Corp. v. Estate of ElkmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  2. Selective Builders, Inc. v. Hudson City Savings BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  3. Longobardi v. Chubb Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  4. Levin v. FrishmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API