Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Drogo

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1926PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

By her will the dowager Duchess of Manchester bequeathed to trustees (now represented by the respondent) over one million dollars in trust, during the life of her son, to apply the annual income “ for the maintenance and support or otherwise, for the benefit of all or any one or more exclusively of the other or others of him my said son his wife and children or other issue as my * * * trustees in their sole and uncontrolled discretion without being liable for the exercise of such discretion think fit.” There was no attempt to provide for any accumulation of this income. Therefore, as the son…

2Cited by33 opinions

  1. Canfield v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Loeb v. LoebIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Herzog v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  4. McCurdy v. HughesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Vanderbilt Credit Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API