Legal Opinion
Griffith Oil Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2009No. Appeal No. 2Published
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking, inter alia, a declaration that defendant-respondent (hereafter, defendant) is obligated to indemnify them in underlying actions, and a proceeding brought against them in connection with a spur *1623pipeline oil leak in Steuben County (see e.g. Steuben Contr. v Griffith Oil Co., 283 AD2d 1008 [2001]). We conclude that Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of defendant for partial summary judgment seeking a declaration that it is not obligated to indemnify plaintiffs under its policy with respect to the action commenced in Steuben County as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- White v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Frontier Insulation Contractors, Inc. v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Berger Bros. Electric Motors, Inc. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Griffith Oil Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Logan's Silo Sales & Service, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.