Legal Opinion

City of Mobile v. Bolden

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 22, 1980No. 77-1844PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

446 U.S. 55 (1980)

CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA, ET AL.

v.

BOLDEN ET AL.

No. 77-1844.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 19, 1979.

Reargued October 29, 1979.

Decided April 22, 1980.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

Charles S. Rhyne reargued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief on reargument were C. B. Arendall, Jr., William C. Tidwell III, Fred G. Collins, and William S. Rhyne. With him on the briefs on the original argument were Messrs. Arendall, Collins, and Rhyne, Donald A. Carr, and Martin W. Matzen.

J. U. Blacksher reargued the cause for…

Also in this document: Judgment of the Court; Concurrence; Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.

2Cases cited115 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leslie Feldman v. Arizona Sec'y of State's Ofc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Ohio Redistricting Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Leslie Feldman v. Arizona Sec'y of State's Ofc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. (PS) Gifford v. KampaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API