Legal Opinion

Clements v. Starbird

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 19, 1943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, J.:

Plaintiffs below, appellants here, brought suit in ejectment against the appellees to recover the possession of certain described land, attaching to the declaration a bill of particulars stating that plaintiffs would rely at the trial upon a certain tax deed executed to the plaintiffs on January 6, 1941, attaching as an exhibit a copy of the tax deed. The defendants filed a plea of not guilty and also filed a motion that the court declare the tax deed null and void. The motion set forth six grounds but the 1st, ■ 2nd and 5th grounds were evidently abandoned and have not been argued…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Tampa v. MuggeSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
  2. Pitt v. Belate IronmongerSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Stewart v. New Smyrna Inlet DistrictSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. State Ex Rel. Neafie v. Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. Poole v. DevaneSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peters v. HansenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Barndollar v. Sunset Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. North v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  4. Sanders v. CrappsSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  5. Hall v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API