Legal Opinion

Shortt v. New Milford Police Department

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 14, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 16 Conn. App. 232, is granted, limited to the following issues:

Jeffrey B. Sienkiewicz, in support of the petition. Janet Bond Arterton, in opposition. Decided October 14, 1988

“1. Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the plaintiff police officer had an independent statutory right for collection of unpaid wages, costs and attorney’s fees under § 31-72 of the Connecticut General Statutes when neither his entitlement to wages nor the amount thereof had been determined under the grievance procedure contained…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shortt v. New Milford Police DepartmentConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shortt v. New Milford Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API