Legal Opinion

Sickler v. City of New York

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 7, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment modified by dismissing plaintiffs causes of action for violation of Labor Law § 241 (6), Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence; by providing that the City of New York’s cross claim against defendant NAB Construction Co. and its third-party claim against third-party defendant AC&S Insulation Corp. for indemnification is remitted for trial for the purpose of reapportioning liability between NAB Construction Co. and AC&S Insulation Corp.; and by deleting the provisions of the judgment awarding plaintiff damages for past and future *51pain and suffering…

2Cases cited24 opinions

Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
Narducci v. Manhasset Bay AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
Brown v. Two Exchange Plaza PartnersNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
Hambsch v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.