Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. New York City Transit Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herbert Shapiro, J.

In this negligence action, the defendant New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA) moves for a protective order with respect to items 10, 18 and 23 (a) of the plaintiff’s demand for discovery.

The portion of the motion addressed to item 23 (a) raises an interesting question. This item requests the reports of all *1028medical examinations, laboratory tests and urine analysis of the motorman of the train allegedly involved in the incident.

NYCTA, the motorman’s employer, opposes the production of the medical and laboratory reports based upon the contention that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Koump v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Dillenbeck v. HessNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Williams v. Roosevelt HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Casimiro v. ThayerNew York Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. Davis, New York County Courts1995
  3. Drexler v. Highlift, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API