Legal Opinion

Perotti v. Marberry

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 7, 2009No. 09-1324PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Federal prisoner John Perotti lost a total of 80 days’ good time after prison authorities concluded that he fought with another inmate and, in a separate incident, swore at a staff member. He petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, see 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging both disciplinary decisions, and the district court dismissed the petition. We affirm the judgment.

The first incident occurred in November 2007. Perotti received an incident report charging him with fighting and possessing a weapon. See 28 C.F.R. § 541.13, tbl. 3, Codes 201,104. The guard who drafted the incident report was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Aaron B. Scruggs v. D. Bruce JordanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. AUSTIN v. WARDENDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021
  2. Andre Moton v. Allen WardenDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2026
  3. BOOKER-EL v. BUTTSDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019
  4. BOOKER-EL v. BUTTSDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
  5. BOWYER v. WARDENDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API