Legal Opinion

Williams v. City of Uniontown

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1922No. Appeal, No. 139PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The relevant facts in this case are not disputed. The plaintiff was elected assistant chief of police of the Borough of Uniontown by the borough council on January 5, 1914; no period of tenure of office being fixed. He took the oat'h of office and entered on the performance of his duties and so continued until August 1,1914, when the burgess undertook to discharge him, and did prevent him from further performing his duties, proceeding to the extent of having him arrested for impersonating an officer. It was proved that he repeatedly tendered his services as such…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Salopek v. AlbertsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API