W. S. Tyler Co. v. Rebic
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, PJ.
“Two specifications of error are presented here:
1st. Was the appeal taken properly? and
2nd. Was oral testimony admissible, in view of the Workmen’s Compensation Law?
The question of whether or not the apepal was properly taken turns on what law governs the appeal at the time it was filed.
Prior to July, 1925, the statute, governing appeals, did not require that an application for rehearing be filed with the Industrial Commission before filing the appeal.
This statute was amended, and the amendment is contained in 111 Ohio Laws, 227, and became effective in July, 1925, which was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Industrial Commission v. VailOhio Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. WillenborgOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
- Industrial Commission v. MarshOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Bettman v. James R. Clow & Sons Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1930