Legal Opinion

Vann v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 11, 1922No. 23,339PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Labette district court; Elmer C. Clark, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This action was brought by Hannah Varm against the M. K. & T. Railway Company to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by her while she was a pas*800senger on defendant’s train that was derailed through the alleged negligence of the defendant. She recovered a judgment for $3,000, and defendant appeals.

One of defendant’s contentions is that plaintiff’s action was barred by the statute of limitations. The injuries to plaintiff were sustained on September 12, 1915. She brought an action to recover damages for the injuries…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago, Kansas & Western Railroad v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  2. O'Neil v. EpplerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Brock v. FrancisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Bannister v. CarrollSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  5. In re SharpSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wente v. ShaverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Jackson v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Williams v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. Penalosa Cooperative Exchange v. A.S. Polonyi Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1991
  5. Myers v. Kansas, O. & G. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API