Legal Opinion

Chittenden v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 21, 2004No. 2003-CA-0681PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EDWIN A. LOMBARD, Judge.

This case arises from an ongoing dispute between an attorney and his former client over the recovery of interest expended on loans secured to fund litigation. The attorney appeals the trial court’s finding that the client overpaid interest and is entitled to a 'reimbursement. For the following reasons we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On June 19, 1992, George Chittenden (“Chittenden”) retained Carimi (“Cari-mi”) 1 to handle a personal injury claim that arose from an automobile accident. Chittenden signed a contingency fee contract that authorized Carimi to secure a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  3. Chittenden v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Landry's Seafood House-New Orleans, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API