Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Dondero v. United States

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 25, 1991No. Civ. A. 91-323-JLLPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.

Elizabeth M. Dondero and her husband Joseph Dondero filed this action against the United States of America pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et seq. (“FTCA”). Elizabeth seeks to recover for personal injuries that she sustained as a result of an automobile accident. Her husband, Joseph, claims loss of consortium as a result of his wife’s injuries. The defendant moved to dismiss Joseph’s loss of consortium claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons stated below, this Court agrees that Joseph’s loss of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Frantz v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
  2. Dupont v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1997
  3. Danowski by Danowski v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
  4. Kieffer v. VilkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  5. Loper v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API