Legal Opinion

Lotoszinski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1979No. Docket 78-3303PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtD. C. Riley, J.

Following an automobile accident, plaintiff sought recovery under the uninsured motorist provisions of policies which plaintiff and her mother held with defendant. Plaintiff requested arbitration on this matter pursuant to the terms of the policy. The arbitrators concluded that plaintiff was not entitled to recovery. On June 20, 1978, an Ingham County circuit judge entered an order denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate the arbitration award. Plaintiff appeals as of right, claiming that the arbitrators exceeded their authority in reaching their decision.

In most instances, an arbitrator’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Simonette v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  2. Gorton v. Reliance Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Brake v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. AyvazianMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. North American Steel Corp. v. Siderius, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. GavinMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. McMillanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Lotoszinski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Farr v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. GavinMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API