Legal Opinion

Union Hay Co. v. Des Moines Flour & Feed Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 11, 1924No. 23,876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

This action was brought to recover damages for the breach of a contract of sale. The trial court found for plaintiff and defendant appealed from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

The sole question is whether a memorandum of the contract sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the statute of frauds was signed by the defendant.

The sale was made on November 23, 1920. A memorandum, signed by defendant and mailed to plaintiff, was in the following form:

“Contract No. 664.

Date November 23rd, 1920.

Confirmation of Purchase.

To Union Hay Company,

Minneapolis, Minnesota.

“We confirm…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Upton Mill & Elevator Co. v. Baldwin Flour MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Bowers v. WhitneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  3. Quinn-Shepherdson Co. v. Triumph Farmers Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ostrowski v. MockridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Simplex Supplies, Inc. v. Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Simplex Supplies, Inc. v. Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API