Legal Opinion
Kaufman v. Fallsburg Central School District Board of Education
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 17, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Levine, J.
This appeal requires us to resolve two issues. First, we are asked to review, for record sufficiency, the Appellate Division’s conclusion that, pursuant to the Rules of the Board of Regents, respondent Kathleen Foreman served in the elementary tenure area during the 1991-1992 school year. We are then called upon to decide whether any legal impediment exists to bar the school district from granting respondent seniority credit in that tenure area.
Respondent Foreman received a probationary appointment from respondent Fallsburg Central School District (District) in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abramovich v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Baer v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Ricca v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Feinerman v. Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Suozzi v. ParenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. Board of Education of Mahopac Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Berrios v. Board of Education of Yonkers City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Cronk v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Cronk v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015