Legal Opinion

Boorstein v. Douglas

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1947No. 471PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Justice.

Appellant was defendant in an action for possession of an apartment. The lease between the parties contained a covenant that the tenant would not “sublet the said apartment or any part thereof, nor transfer possession or occupancy thereof, to any person or persons * * * nor assign this lease” without the written consent of the landlord. Plaintiff claimed this covenant had'.been violated, and on that ground she'sued for possession. No evidence was presented showing subletting or assignment of the lease, but plaintiff claimed defendant had transferred “possession or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meaney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Sorrels v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  3. Stafford v. American Security & Trust Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1931
  4. United States v. Chichester Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ellison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Monday v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API