Legal Opinion
Glickman v. Home Title Guaranty Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 16, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge M. Fanelli, J.
This is a motion by plaintiff to strike out an affirmative defense pleaded in defendant’s answer, because of legal insufficiency (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 109).
The action is based upon a policy of title insurance issued by defendant to plaintiff and poses the interesting question concerning the nature and purpose of such title insurance. The complaint alleges in substance that at the time plaintiff acquired *304title to the real property in question (April 17,1956) defendant, for a valuable consideration, issued its policy insuring plaintiff’s interest in fee simple to said premises effective as of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Home Title InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- First National Bank & Trust Co. v. New York Title InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- Home Title Ins. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Holly Hotel Co. v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1932
- Empire Development Co. v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Summonte v. First Amer. Title Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Inavest Enterprises v. TRW Title Insurance of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993