Legal Opinion

State v. Bearchild

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2004No. 03-307PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Dewayne Bearchild (Bearchild) was charged with the crime of incest on February 14,2002. On the day of trial, December 2,2002, but before voir dire proceedings began, the prosecutor moved to challenge two jurors for cause. Bearchild objected to both challenges. The District Court denied the first challenge, but granted the second challenge. On December 3,2002, the jury found Bearchild guilty of incest. Bearchild appeals from the District Court’s decision to permit the State to challenge the second juror for cause prior to voir dire. We affirm.

¶2 The sole issue on appeal is whether the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Daniel M. Paradies, the Paradies Shops, Inc., Paradies Midfield Corporation, Ira JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. State v. LaMereMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. United States of America, and v. Doloras Contreras, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AguadoMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. B. HilliousMontana Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Miller v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. Neal E. FehringerMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. OschmannMontana Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API