Cathy Brockhaus Paradoski v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice
In this appeal appellant Cathy Parado-ski challenges her conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI). The record contains evidence that appellant ingested two types of prescription medication. Though appellant concedes she was operating a motor vehicle without the normal use of her faculties, she asserts she suffered a transient ischemic attack (TIA), causing her to lose control of her faculties while driving. On appeal, we address the sufficiency of the evidence supporting her conviction as well as claimed errors in the trial court’s admission of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Turro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.