Legal Opinion
Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper Network, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 9, 2021No. 3:17-cv-05659Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 FINJAN, INC., 11 Plaintiff, No. C 17-05659 WHA 12 v. 13 JUNIPER NETWORK, INC., et al., ORDER RE REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES 14 Defendants. 15 16 INTRODUCTION 17 Following affirmance by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit of the 18 rulings in this patent infringement suit, the prevailing defendant moves for attorney’s fees. 19 Because this case did stand out as exceptional in certain respects, a limited award of attorney’s 20 fees under
35 U.S.C. § 285
is warranted. 21 STATEMENT 22 Patent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. BecerraSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Heffernan v. City of PatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Electronic Communication v. shopperschoice.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020