Legal Opinion

Greenberg v. Robertson-Stelling Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 10, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff was bound to anticipate that defendant’s automobile as it approached the crossing at Broadway and Eighty-sixth street, the rear of said automobile being then ten feet ahead of plaintiff’s car, might be stopped by traffic regulations or otherwise, and under the circumstances the running of plaintiff’s car into the end of defendant’s car when that car stopped at Eighty-sixth street indicated plaintiff’s lack of control of his car and established contributory negligence on the plaintiff’s part, thus barring a recovery.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Felder v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Greenberg v. Robertson-Stelling Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. Smith v. BuntingNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API