Legal Opinion

Keller v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1985No. Appeal, No. 223 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

Harry Keller, Jr. (¡Claimant), appeals from a decision by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee’s decision to modi*479fy Claimant’s disability benefits to specific loss benefits, pursuant to Section 306(c) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act).1

Claimant suffered a compensable injury while in the course of his employment with Blair Strip Steel Corporation (Employer) on June 26, 1978. Claimant was transferring a coil of steel from a tow motor when the coil slipped and damaged his left foot. Claimant received compensation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burkey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Klaric v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wittco Fashions v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Bakula v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. M & G Convoy, Inc. v. MaukCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Madison Construction Co. v. WCAB (Tascarella)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API