Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Willard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 7, 1984No. 83-2785Published

1Per curiam

We reverse the directed verdict entered in favor of the defendant upon a finding that the plaintiff had at least made out a prima facie case for recovery of a debt on a simple contract. See Locke v. Aetna Acceptance Corp., 309 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). See generally 6 Fla.Jur.2d Bills and Notes § 21. We further hold that the court erred in finding the instrument nonnegotiable because it was payable out of “restaurant earnings.” Payment was not conditioned to be made only out of that source. § 673.105(1)(f), Fla.Stat. (1975); Wright v. Board of Public Instruction for County of Sumter, 77…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barnett Bank v. Regency Highland CondominiumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Wright v. Board of Public Instruction for SumterSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Locke v. Aetna Acceptance CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API