Legal Opinion

Winner v. Cataldo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 10, 1990No. 89-728PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal seeks review of an award of attorney’s fees on behalf of a party named in a derivative action, purportedly pursuant to the provisions of Section 607.147(4), Florida Statutes (1985). We have previously found that there was merit in the derivative suit. Ginsberg v. Keehn, 550 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)

Cataldo was one of several defendants in the derivative action but was dismissed out before final judgment. The trial court awarded fees to Cataldo on the theory that there was no reasonable basis to sue him. (Parenthetically, Winner was represented by counsel at the trial level who…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ginsberg v. KeehnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Grizzard v. PetkasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Legal Envir. Assistance v. DepDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Daly v. DalyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2023
  3. Daren C. DalyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API