Legal Opinion

In re Elston

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 18, 1927No. 3407Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN B. SANBORN, District Judge.

In his schedules in bankruptcy, the ■bankrupt listed as assets: Twenty-one .acres of field com, 8 acres of fodder com, 1% acres of late potatoes, 1 ton of hay, 40 bushels of barley, 200 bushels of succotash, and 60 bushels of potatoes. In the •schedules, he made his claim for exemption ■as follows:

“Bankrupt claims as exempted on property allowed him by section 7951 of the Gen•eral Statutes of the state of Minnesota for ■■the year 1913, set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, :3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, and 11 of said section, including all other farming utensils including tackle…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  2. Olin v. FoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API