Radatron, Inc. v. Z. Z. Auto Telephone, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
-—• Order unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent, without prejudice to the right of appellant, if so advised, to renew the motion on sufficient papers. Memorandum: In support of its motion to change the venue of this action upon a contract from Niagara County, plaintiff’s county of residence, to New York County, defendant’s county residence, defendant has named several witnesses whom it asserts " would have to be witnesses to testify to the fact that the devices [sold by plaintiff to defendant under the contract] were fraudulently misrepresented and advertised and not as warranted in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McDermott v. McDermottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Rieger v. Pulaski Glove Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
3Cited by13 opinions
- O'Brien v. Vassar Bros. HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Hurlbut v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Jansen v. BernhangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Brevetti v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Bunker v. BunkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.