Legal Opinion · Dissent

Billings v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 22, 1987No. A14-84-861 CR, C14-85-045 CR and A14-85-046 CRPublished

1DissentMurphy, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The majority relies on Ex Parte Siller, 686 S.W.2d 617 (Tex.Crim.App.1985) to reform the judgment and set aside the convictions for the offenses of misapplication of fiduciary property and official misconduct. I would go further than the majority and hold that the failure by the trial judge to grant appellants motion to sever constituted reversible error.

I agree with the majority that appellant has not preserved his second point of error with regard to counts one and two of the indictment, however I disagree with the analysis set out on the assumption that the point…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Drake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Romine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Keimig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Sifford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API