Tingstol Company v. Rainbow Sales Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge.
This case requires interpreting what a contract meant by the word “orders” and whether something called a “blanket order” qualified.
Tingstol Company of Chicago manufactures printed circuit boards, a car part. In 1983 Rainbow Sales Incorporated became Tingstol’s exclusive sales agent in Florida, which entitled Rainbow to a 5 percent commission on all of Tingstol’s sales there. Under the terms of their 1993 written contract, either side could pull out of the deal with 60 days notice. Tingstol gave Rainbow 60 days notice to end the relationship in November 1996.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Omnitrus Merging Corp. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company v. Metron Engineering and Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- John M. Robich v. Patent Button Company of Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
3Cited by10 opinions
- Curia v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Lewitton v. ITA Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Super Stop Petroleum, Inc. v. Clark Retail Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Clark Retail Enterprises, Inc.)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- American Medical Security, Inc. v. Executive Risk Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
- Bohling v. Pharmacia Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.