State ex rel. F. W.
Hudson County Family Court
1Opinion of the Court
Gilmore, J. J. & D. R.
Because of the composition of the form of complaint utilized in the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Courts, this matter arises sua sponte. One complaint charges that F.W. did feloniously receive and have in his pos*514session the goods of another, which goods and chattels were of the value of $1,000. A second complaint charges that F.W. did attempt to feloniously steal the goods of a third person, which goods were of the value of $5,300.
Both complaints allege that these acts occurred on July 27, 1974 at 5:03 a.m. Both complaints aver that “these facts, if established would…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nelson v. SandkampSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Commonwealth v. HoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- William Neil Turnbull v. Josephine Bonkowski and Leonard KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Linhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Fisher v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- State in Interest of FWNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Commonwealth v. Lombardo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1984
- United States v. TuckerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- United States v. TuckerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979