Frederick A. Webster v. Sea Drilling Corporation v. Boatel, Inc., Defendant-Impleader-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the Clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir.1969, 409 F. 2d 804, Part I.
The appellant, Webster, brought this diversity suit in the court below to recover for injuries he sustained while working on an oil drilling rig located in the Gulf of Mexico off the Louisiana coast. The action was originally based on unseaworthiness and negligence but…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Cornelia O'COnnOr Grey, James Charles Grey and Michael Carter Grey v. First National Bank in DallasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
- Pearson B. Garrett, Jr. v. Ellis Campbell, Jr., District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mrs. Lois B. Nevels v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Robert B. Troutman, Jr. v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Joseph Henry Kyzar v. Vale Do Ri Doce Navegacai, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Lena Sias Bolden v. Kansas City Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- De Raine O. Andry v. Farrell Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.