Legal Opinion

Dingman v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1880PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR to the Circuit Court for La Fayette County. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTayloR, J.

Upon a trial in the circuit court for La Payette county, the plaintiff was adjudged to be the father of a bastard child of one Ellen Waistell, and was required to pay the sum of $350 for the past and future support and maintenance of such child, and the costs of the prosecution, amounting to the sum of $43.69, and to give bond with sufficient sureties for the payment of said sums; and, on default thereof, to be committed to the county jail of said county until he shall pei’forni such judgment or be otherwise discharged according to law.

The plaintiff in error caused a bill of exceptions to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vedder v. . FellowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Hill v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Fowler v. ColtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1843
  4. Ketchum v. EbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cupps v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Territory of Dakota v. O'HareNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hannon v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Lavery v. CrookeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Horr v. C. W. Howard Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API