Legal Opinion

Caudillo v. Corporation Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 22, 1976No. 48099PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Justice:

This appeal involves an Application for an Order establishing a 10-acre drilling and spacing unit for the production of oil and gas from the Second Wilcox Formation underlying the E/2 of SW/4 of NE/4 of SE/4 and W/2 of SE/4 of NE/4 of SE/4 of Section 24, Township 26 North, Range 1 West, Kay County, Oklahoma.

*1111The Appellant, Juan Caudillo, will be referred to as “Appellant”; Ashland Oil, Inc., as “Ashland”; the Applicant, Roy Fath, as “Appellee”; and the Corporation Commission as “Commission”.

The matter came on for hearing upon the Application of Appellee, Roy Fath, mineral…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harvey v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Needham v. HaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Cameron v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Mulkey v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Manufacturers National Bank v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Calvert Drilling Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API