Caudillo v. Corporation Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Justice:
This appeal involves an Application for an Order establishing a 10-acre drilling and spacing unit for the production of oil and gas from the Second Wilcox Formation underlying the E/2 of SW/4 of NE/4 of SE/4 and W/2 of SE/4 of NE/4 of SE/4 of Section 24, Township 26 North, Range 1 West, Kay County, Oklahoma.
*1111The Appellant, Juan Caudillo, will be referred to as “Appellant”; Ashland Oil, Inc., as “Ashland”; the Applicant, Roy Fath, as “Appellee”; and the Corporation Commission as “Commission”.
The matter came on for hearing upon the Application of Appellee, Roy Fath, mineral…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harvey v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Needham v. HaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Cameron v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Mulkey v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
3Cited by2 opinions
- Manufacturers National Bank v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Calvert Drilling Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979