Legal Opinion

Bogert v. Adams

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Pueblo County.

1Opinion of the CourtThomson, J.

The final judgment in this case was in favor of the appellants ; but an attachment -which, they had procured in aid of their suit was dissolved-, and it is from the order dissolving the attachment that this-appeal was taken. There can be no -appeal to this court except from a final judgment. Here the final judgment was for the appellants, and therefore-could not be appealed from by them. Hall v. Pay Rock C. M. Co., 6 Colo. 81.

The order dissolving the attachment was interlocutory, and *511no appeal lies from such an order. Hagerman v. Moore, 2 Colo. App. 83.

“ Appeals are the creatures of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall v. Pay Rock Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1881
  2. Hagerman v. MooreColorado Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Gordon v. GraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1893

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nation v. SavelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Sutton v. JonesColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Thuringer v. BonnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Colby v. BirchArapahoe County District Court · 1898
  5. Lockhaven Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API