Legal Opinion

In re Nathanson

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 7, 1907PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On motion to confirm the report of a special commissioner overruling amended specifications to a bankrupt’s discharge. Denied.

1Opinion of the Court

CHATFIEED., District Judge.

One of the petitioning creditors, Hyman Ensler, filed specifications in opposition to the bankrupt’s application for discharge upon the 17th day of December, 1906, consisting of six allegations upon information and belief, and a seventh allegation, which charged directly that the bankrupt had made a false oath in relation to certain books of account or records, from which his true financial condition might be ascertained. These specifications were verified according to the form of verification provided by the laws of the state of New York for a complaint in an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
  2. In re ServisDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1905
  3. E. H. Godshalk Co. v. SterlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904
  4. In re Milgraum & OstDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. In re KufflerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re UlrichDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
  2. In re SlatkinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1923
  3. In re McLaughlinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1933
  4. Barco v. DockinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  5. In re PettisDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API