Succession of Sampognaro
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
|, CARAWAY, J.
Following our ruling in Succession of Sampognaro, 38,112 (La.App.2d Cir.1/28/04), 865 So.2d 307 (“Sampognaro I ”), the trial court determined that despite the irregularity in the decedent’s will, the notarial act was conducted in accordance with the formalities of the law and the *705validity of the will was upheld. Nevertheless, in the course of the trial of the matter, the evidence revealed that the notary who notarized the will was a disbarred lawyer who acted in violation of La. R.S. 35:14. Appellant, therefore, appeals the trial court’s ruling and contests the will due to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. SadlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
- State v. StriplingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Davenport v. DavenportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- State v. O'REILLYSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- City of Baton Rouge v. CooleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McClure v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013