Legal Opinion

Muhammed v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 24, 1999No. 97-475 TPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WIESE, Judge.

Plaintiff, a pro se litigant, sues here to recover federal excise taxes paid on inventory purchases of gasoline and diesel fuel that was later resold to a tax-exempt municipal entity. A refund is also claimed for excise taxes paid on fuel inventories that were lost to ground seepage due to the rupture of underground storage tanks following a prolonged period of heavy rain. The Government has moved for dismissal on the grounds that plaintiffs original filing does not constitute an informal refund claim sufficient to confer jurisdiction on this court, that the action is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BrockampSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Abraham Barenfeld and Lena Barenfeld v. The United States. Charles Barenfeld and Irma Barenfeld v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  3. Arch Engineering Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Wall Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  5. Valley Ice & Fuel Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API