Legal Opinion

Dominick v. Haynes Bros.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1930No. 3698PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDrew, J.

This is an action for damages to plaintiff’s truck, received in a collision with defendants’ ear. Plaintiff alleges, and the facts show, that at the location of the collision the highway was obscured by a heavy smoke from burning grass on the roadside. ■ The petition further alleges, and the facts show, that before entering the smoke both drivers were stopped by road guards and instructed to turn on their lights, drive slowly, and keep to the right side of the road. Plaintiff’s car was going north on the road and defendants’ car was coming south on the same road. The smoke obscured the road…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Castille v. RichardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Campbell v. American Home Assurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  2. O'Rourke v. McConaughey.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Safety Tire Service, Inc. v. MurovLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Palmer v. MarceilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  5. Shell Oil Co. v. SladeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API