Legal Opinion

Covert v. Hughes

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1876Published

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the trial of this action by the court without a jury. ■

1Opinion of the Court

BoardMAN, J.:

This appeal is taken by Mahala Hughes alone, she being the wife of John Hughes, from the judgment which charges her real estate with the payment of $496.27, originally charged by the plaintiffs to her husband, besides costs of this action.

The defendant Mahala Hughes is justly indebted to the plaintiffs for feed, etc., purchased by defendant of plaintiffs, and fed to her cattle, horses and other stock owned by her and constituting a part of her separate estate. She is also indebted to plaintiffs for insurance premium paid by them upon defendant’s house, also a part of her separate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API