Anders v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Commissioner.
Appeal is taken from a conviction for burglary. 1 Punishment, enhanced under Article 62, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., twelve years.
At the outset, appellant contends that the evidence will not sustain the conviction because it is based upon the testimony of an accomplice witness which is not sufficiently corroborated as required by Article 38.-14, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P. 2
The test for determining the evidence required to support a conviction in addition to the testimony of an accomplice has been stated by this court in numerous opinions as follows:
“The test of the sufficiency of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Cherb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Ysasaga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Minor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Paulus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Attwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.