Marriage of Karon v. Karon
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentCoyne, Justice
Consider that not unlikely event that a woman entering into a stipulation identical to that presented shortly thereafter suffers a totally disabling illness that threatens to quickly exhaust all of her available resources and that, during the same period, her former husband enjoys a substantial increase in income. The majority opinion broadly decrees that the agreement is valid, the waiver of jurisdiction is final and that the courts are powerless to fashion a remedy. I cannot concur in a decision which has this potential effect and I therefore dissent. I am simply unable to reconcile the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marriage of DeLa Rosa v. DeLa RosaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Kaiser v. KaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Warren v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Kiesow v. KiesowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.