Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marriage of Karon v. Karon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 1989No. C2-87-976Published

1DissentCoyne, Justice

Consider that not unlikely event that a woman entering into a stipulation identical to that presented shortly thereafter suffers a totally disabling illness that threatens to quickly exhaust all of her available resources and that, during the same period, her former husband enjoys a substantial increase in income. The majority opinion broadly decrees that the agreement is valid, the waiver of jurisdiction is final and that the courts are powerless to fashion a remedy. I cannot concur in a decision which has this potential effect and I therefore dissent. I am simply unable to reconcile the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Marriage of DeLa Rosa v. DeLa RosaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Kaiser v. KaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Warren v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Kiesow v. KiesowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API